tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21609676.post4647514541231586621..comments2024-02-21T03:20:21.898-08:00Comments on An Inch At A Time: Reflections on the Journey: Risen Lord, be known to us in the breaking of the breadSUSAN RUSSELLhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01795717638621668638noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21609676.post-86290019183193680822009-04-26T20:21:00.000-07:002009-04-26T20:21:00.000-07:00I am a combination of Peter Abelard and Gustaf Aul...I am a combination of Peter Abelard and Gustaf Aulen. I wrote an essay on this which I will Email to Mother Susan. She can read it and do with it what she wishes.Rev. David Justin Lynchhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00250968772752560668noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21609676.post-29739602644412031192009-04-26T16:59:00.000-07:002009-04-26T16:59:00.000-07:00I have to agree with Christopher that this post se...I have to agree with Christopher that this post seems to seriously distort Anselm.<br /><br />I'd have to look over the whole thing, but I'm not sure that the "wrath of God" is even mentioned in Cur Deus Homo. I may be wrong--it's a biblical phrase, of course--but I think Anselm's use of the terminology of "honor" allows him to avoid that.<br /><br />But here he is himself:<br /><br />"Boso. Nowrick allenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07612435616018593956noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21609676.post-52040063174165238112009-04-26T15:21:00.000-07:002009-04-26T15:21:00.000-07:00St Anselm did NOT teach a penal substitution theor...St Anselm did NOT teach a penal substitution theory of the Atonement. At best he taught a substitutionary or vicarious theory of Atonement. They are not the same thing. Because for St Anselm, Jesus and the Father are one, simplistic readings of a Divine Child Abuse model into his theory just don't do justice to his work. <br /><br />I recommend the blog, Ember Days, that of an Anselmian Christopherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10400109177404296836noreply@blogger.com