Friday, April 16, 2010

Another "inch at a time:"

Gay visitation order shows how Obama brings big change with small actions

By Michael D. Shear + Washington Post Staff Writer + Saturday, April 17, 2010

President Obama's decision Thursday night to grant same-sex couples hospital visitation rights is the latest and most visible example of a strategy to make concrete steps toward equality for gays and lesbians without sparking a broad cultural debate or a fight with Congress.

The approach has angered some of the president's fiercest supporters, who are eager for bold change, but other politically savvy activists have encouraged Obama to act in small ways to reshape government rules and regulations on behalf of gays and lesbians.

Soon after Obama's election, staffers from the Human Rights Campaign presented the transition team with a list of 70 actions the president could take without congressional approval.

The activists sat in a room at the transition's headquarters as a stream of soon-to-be officials with the departments of Justice, State, Labor and Health and Human Services rotated in for discussions, according to several of those present. Melody Barnes, who now heads the president's domestic policy council, sat in, too.

Over the next several months, the administration quietly began acting on the recommendations: The State Department started issuing embassy ID cards to same-sex partners of diplomats; Housing and Urban Development ended discrimination in housing assistance programs; HHS pledged to change its policies regarding HIV-positive visitors and immigrants.

And then, last May, HRC staffers got a call from Obama's legal office. Top officials in the White House had seen a gut-wrenching story about a lesbian couple who had been kept apart in the hospital when one collapsed and died. It was time to act, they decided.

"They were thinking about how do you do it. What are the legal ways that HHS can address this issue?" recalled Allison Herwitt, the legislative director for HRC. "They picked up the phone to say, 'We are really energized about this issue.' "

Nevertheless, the issue of hospital visitation languished for months as the White House got pulled deeper into the health-care debate and other pressing issues.

Kevin Cathcart, the executive director of Lambda Legal, which had filed a lawsuit on behalf of the Florida couple, said he repeatedly raised the issue with White House officials in telephone calls, private conversations and group meetings.

And then, several activists were invited to a March 9 meeting at the Old Executive Office Building. Members of the White House counsel's office were there, along with officials with the Office of Public Engagement, including Brian Bond, who handles gay and lesbian issues for the president. They discussed the ramifications of government action on the hospital issue.

West Wing officials made it clear that things were about to move quickly. "We're on track to getting this," they told those assembled.

Read the rest here ... and give thanks for the "inches at a time" that move us forward into God's future.


Göran Koch-Swahne said...

Congratulations to you all! things are at last beginning to move ;=)

IT said...

Sorry, but I cannot help but think this will be used as a sop to keep us away from marriage. "See, you don't need to be married to have hospital rights."

They want the whole marriage question swept under the carpet, so they throw us a bone to shut us up.

Call me cynical. I am.


I have a healthy respect for cynicism. It's a great antitode to complacency.

And ... (you knew they'd be an "and ...")

When I look back over the progress we've made in the Episcopal Church it's been a long and winding road that included many "inches forward" that at the time were "spun" as either [a] the thin end of the wedge that was going to end western civilization and destroy the church as we know it or [b] a token concession that was going to to distract us from our goal of full inclusion.

So while I "get" that this one could be construed as the latter, I'm choosing to celebrate it as the former.

(And if anyone needs a "refresher course" on how we got where we are in TEC click here ...

... for a survey of "inches forward (along with a couple of steps backward!) past."

IT said...

I'd be happier if it weren't an exec order that President Palin can rescind. Just ask the folks in Virginia who lost all their protections with a change of governor!

You're a hopeful person, Susan. I hope you are right.!