That's the question being asked in an article posted earlier today in The Living Church.
In case anyone is interested, here's my short answer: Yes.
In case anyone is interested, here's my short answer: Yes.
In case anyone is still interested, here's my longer answer: I was raised in a family where my Aunt Gretchen (who
lived with us) was a member of one of the parishes that tried to leave the
Diocese of Los Angeles over the ordination of women (Holy Apostles, Glendale)
and died with a "Save the 1928 Prayer Book" bumper sticker on her
car. ... and yet she never "left the church" and we still went to
communion together. All that to say I never remember a time when we have not
been a tradition challenged by differences. The issue is whether those
differences are inevitably divisions -- or if the DNA of Anglican
Comprehensiveness is sufficient to embrace them.
There is an ontological difference between feeling
excluded because you're disagreed with and being excluded because of who you
are. As a faith tradition formed out of the crucible of the Reformation with
the radical innovation of insisting it is possible to both catholic and
protestant, it is arguably antithetical to our historic Anglican ethos to
insist that one's criterion for being included is being agreed with. So yes:
there is room in the Episcopal church for conservatives and progressives --
just as there has always been room for catholics and protestants. What there is
not room for is confusing exercising one's theological conscience with imposing
one's theological conscience. The former is part of our heritage; the latter is
not.
No comments:
Post a Comment