Monday, November 29, 2010

Sermon for Advent One - Twenty Ten

I'm in Burlingame for most of the week working on SCLM-C056 Blessing Task Force business -- blessed to be doing work I'm honored and challenged by and delighted to be in the company of a GREAT cloud of witnesses at the Mercy Center. So I'm a little late getting this posted ... yesterday's sermon (which feels like a week ago already, but there it is!)

Sometimes I'm not sure it's OK for a preacher to admit they liked a sermon ... but I liked this one. And yes, I was preaching to myself a big chunk of the time. Particularly in the staying-hopeful-in-spite-0f-it-all part. Happy Advent, Everybody!

Watch the video or read the text:

Recalculating 2.0: Navigating the New Normal

Happy New Year, Church! We knew it was coming … the signs of the “end times” that lead to new beginnings are popping up all around us … and of course I’m talking about the – “Rose Parade Parking Here” signs -- have brought us once again to this new beginning … a new church year on this First Sunday of Advent.

We know that Advent is a time of waiting …the hymns and lessons are full of the language of waiting and yearning and anticipation: O Come, O Come Emmanuel – Singing Songs of Expectation – Keep you lamps trimmed and burning … and every year I’m reminded that Advent waiting is its own special animal.

A friend of mine once described how "waiting" during Advent is different than some of the other kinds of "waiting" we do -- waiting for a bus, for example. Waiting for a bus is both boring and anxiety-producing. Will it be on time? Will I make my connection? Am I waiting at the right bus stop . . . what if I looked at the schedule wrong? Where IS that bus, anyway? That's waiting in anxiety.

Waiting in expectancy is more like being seated in the concert hall, waiting for the curtain to rise. We know something wonderful is about to happen: and everyone else is waiting with the same expectation. We may know what to expect -- we've bought the tickets, looked over the program, checked out the performers - but the experience is yet to happen. And so we wait -- we wait expectantly; we wait in the tension of both knowing and NOT knowing -- open to the experience about to unfold: expectant rather than anxious.

And I believe that is exactly the kind of "Advent Attitude" God calls us to aim for: to live in both trust and tension as we prepare, once again, for the coming of the One whose birth turned the world upside down as certainly as the preparations for his birthday turn our schedules upside down every year at this time. For the righteousness Jesus offered - the love he proclaimed -- was too radical, too inclusive, too dangerous to survive without creating chaos for the status quo -- then or now.

It is an amazing irony that the very Jesus who gave his life to show us how to love each other been co-opted by those who understand the Reign of Christ to be not about the Lordship of Love but about obedience to orthodoxy. And – unfortunately – the signs of that irony are as ubiquitous in the culture as the Rose Parade parking signs are in Pasadena … including our own Archbishop of Canterbury who was behaving badly again this week. Bless his heart.

But instead of just talking about what Advent is NOT I wanted to talk this morning about what it is: to look at not just the waiting but what we’re waiting FOR.

My second image for Advent this is Advent as an ADVENTURE. I’d like to be able to tell you I hit upon the connection in the root words of both Advent and Adventure through some kind of impressive original-language word study like the rector does but actually it was the 2 freeway southbound last week. I was stuck in traffic on my way the Cathedral Center behind a U-Haul truck – and their current ad campaign is “U-Haul … Adventures in Moving.” So after a few minutes of staring at the back of the truck I started to think … hmmmm … Advent. Adventure. Advent. Adventure.

And here’s what I came up with The Advent Adventure is NOT just a commute to Christmas – it’s the beginning of another year of our spiritual journey into God’s future. And this year we’re taking that journey into what people keep calling “the new normal.”

Now, I “get” that 50 is the new “30.” (I don’t actually BELIEVE it but I get it!) But I’m still trying to figure out the “new normal.”

Part of my confusion is this. Here’s a quote I read in an editorial the other day:

Helpless anger is a familiar sensation today. We all feel that way at times about government and helplessness seems to be a daily part of life on many levels. Americans who pride themselves on their ability to get things done are bound to feel a deeper sense of frustration in the face of events they cannot control.
Sounds familiar. It’s exactly what everybody else seems to be saying after this bruising election cycle in this challenging economy facing global climate issues and rampant polarization. Except this is a quote in a now-defunct magazine called “The Episcopalian” – and it was published in October 1969.

I’m not bringing it up this morning to in any way dismiss the very real challenges we face as a congregation, as a nation and as a global community as we figure out what this “new normal” thing is. I bring it up to remind us – to remind myself – that “helpless anger” is, in fact, a classic response to fear and anxiety – and that just because it’s part of our history doesn’t mean it has to be part of our future.

I had an email from a blog reader last week thanking me for something I’d written and in the process saying “I don’t know how you can stay so hopeful in the middle of all of this.” And I thought for Pete’s Sake … we belong to the God whose love was powerful enough to fix even Good Friday! As Christians we are people of hope – hope that is NOT the same as optimism -- but hope that is grounded in the promise of the resurrection –the promise that the love of God more powerful even that Good Friday can empower us to overcome the challenges we face.

As we begin this Advent Adventure that is NOT just a commute to Christmas we can choose to be grounded in that hope -- in the ancient values that have guided the journeys of the faithful down through the ages. The route may differ from years past. The obstacles may shift and change. But the journey is the same.
And the values are the same. Love, Peace, Compassion, Justice. Ancient values for the “new normal.”

And so what I’m wondering this morning is if the 2010 version of the old Advent “keep your lamps trimmed and burning” hymn might not be “keep your GPS charged and programmed.” I can’t remember the last time I ‘trimmed a lamp’ – the closest I ever came was reading about it in “Little House in the Big Woods.” But I sure depend on my GPS! And some of you may remember when I shared the “GPS epiphany” I had during the “Excellent European Adventure” Louise and I had last summer. Here’s the long story short:

We were on a month-long European adventure with the most patient GPS on the planet. She never panicked. She never raised her voice. She never freaked out when the road signs suddenly changed from Italian to German and then back to Italian. She never said, “How many times do I have to tell you?” She never said, “I cannot believe you missed that turn.” And she certainly never said, “No! No! the other left!” Instead, no matter how clueless or far afield we got, her patient, persistent refrain was, “Recalculating.”

I think it is fair to say it took us a little while to trust her – and we can pinpoint the moment when that happened. It was as we were arriving at our hotel on Lake Como, in Italy – which is absolutely as fabulous as everyone says it is, and you can totally see why George Clooney wants to hang out there. I’m looking at the map, and Louise is looking at the GPS, and she’s saying, “This can’t be right. We’re going to end up in the middle of the lake. Our hotel is on the other side of the lake. There’s no way this could be right.” So we’re driving along – and the tension is mounting -- and suddenly our patient, wise, persistent GPS says … “In 500 meters, board the ferry.”

Who knew there was a ferry? Well, the GPS did, and we never doubted her again.

The “epiphany” for me was that the way the GPS guided Louise and me on our Excellent European Adventure is how I believe the Holy Spirit guides each and every one of us on our Excellent Earthly Adventures as followers of Jesus. She is patient, she is persistent. No matter how clueless we are or far afield we go, her patient, persistent refrain is, “Recalculating.”

And it is my brothers and sisters, an ancient refrain. Like a GPS connected to the satellite that keeps it on course as long as it is plugged in, we are connected to the love of God who will keep us on course if we stay plugged in and keep our lives in alignment with God’s justice, with God’s love, and with God’s compassion.

And we “plug in” when we come here, to remember that we are both loved and called to walk in love -- come to be fed a fuelled and go back out into the world and witness to that love. “Do this in remembrance of me” – we will say in just a few minutes, when we gather around this table to share the bread and wine made holy. “In remembrance of,” to remember – as the rector says, to reverse our amnesia – that we are loved by God and called to go and to return, to plug in our GPS.

Old road maps may not navigate us through a new normal -- but we can keep our GPS charged and programmed – and She will see us through. And there’s no time like the present to start trusting our Spiritual GPS the way Louise and I finally started trusting our European GPS.

Because the truth on this First Sunday of Advent in the year 2010 is that the world we’re called to navigate is not an Advent world – and I’m not just talking about the Christmas carols at the mall or the Christmas Blend at Starbucks we’ve been drinking for a month already. It is not a world waiting in eager anticipation for the curtain to rise – it is waiting in anxiety for the next shoe to drop.

There’s the helpless anger of people who “want their country back” and the hopeless hunger of people who wonder where their next meal is coming from. The saber rattling is escalating in Korea while the combat continues in Afghanistan and the AIDS pandemic continues in Africa as health workers combat cholera in Haiti. Hunger and homelessness are on the rise and violence against women and the bullying of LGBT youth are rampant.

And the church – the Body of Christ on earth that is supposed to be helping people make sense of all this – make a difference in the middle of all this – navigate through all this – well … it seems to have unplugged its GPS altogether and just keeps driving around the same old block: from “Keep-gay-couples-from-getting-married Street” to “No-women-bishops Avenue” to “The-Bible-said –it-I-believe-it-that-settles-it Boulevard” to “Protect Christmas by emailing everybody you know and telling them not to let anybody wish them “Happy Holidays” Road.”

And then there’s shock and dismay when yet another poll shows more and more people find the church irrelevant.

Yep. It’s time for some Advent Recalculating, alright. So here’s the breaking news for the First Sunday of Advent 2010:

All Saints Church is not committed to making God’s love tangible 24/7 and turning the human race into the human family because Ed Bacon had a glory attack one day and said, “Church – here’s what we’re going to do.” All Saints Church is committed to making God’s love tangible 24/7 and turning the human race into the human family because we are committed to the ancient values that fuel our journey into “the new normal.” The values of prophets like Micah … do justice, love mercy and walk humbly with your God; and apostles like Matthew … love God and love your neighbor as yourself.

So as we begin this Advent Adventure 2010 that is NOT just a commute to Christmas let us do so guided by the ancient values that have guided the journeys of the faithful down through the ages.

Let sing the familiar hymns and pray the familiar prayers and keep our lamps trimmed and buring AND our GPS charged and programmed as we wait the coming – once again – of the one who loved us enough to become one of us in order to show us how to walk in love with God and with each other:

Come, O Christ and dwell among us! Hear our cries, come set us free.
Give us hope and faith and gladness. Show us what there yet can be.
Set us free to be the change you call us to be.
Set us free to live your love.
Set us free to be your justice.
Set us free to journey into the adventure of God’s future this Advent and always.
Happy New Year! Amen.

12 comments:

RonF said...

A bitof perspective from our 'friends' at the UN:

"Last week, the Third Committee of the United Nations General Assembly voted on a special resolution addressing extrajudicial, arbitrary and summary executions. The resolution affirms the duties of member countries to protect the right to life of all people with a special emphasis on a call to investigate killings based on discriminatory grounds. The resolution highlights particular groups historically subject to executions including street children, human rights defenders, members of ethnic, religious, and linguistic minority communities, and, for the past 10 years, the resolution has included sexual orientation as a basis on which some individuals are targeted for death."

"The tiny West African nation of Benin (on behalf of the UN’s African Group) proposed an amendment to strike sexual minorities from the resolution. The amendment was adopted with 79 votes in favor, 70 against, 17 abstentions and 26 absent …"

"Those against the amendment include every European nation present, all Scandinavian countries, India, Korea, most of Latin America, all of North America, and only one Middle Eastern nation: Israel."

In the Carribean you'll likely be jailed for being gay; in the rest of the Middle East, Africa and the you'll most likely be executed.

Just a little perspective on what it's like to be gay in America ....

SUSAN RUSSELL said...

I'm not sure I get your point, Ron.

Are we supposed to be grateful we only experience marriage discrimination, can't serve our country openly in the military and can be fired in 36 states for being gay ... not to mention are at risk for hate crimes and our youth for bullying ... because at least "they" aren't out to kill us?

By that reckoning we should have settled for abolishing slavery and not pushed ahead with desegregation and the civil rights movement.

Or is there a nuance in your comment I'm missing on only 1/2 cup of coffee this morning?

IT said...

It's the old "shut up and be grateful we don't shoot you" reaction.

The argument that because it's worse elsewhere, we should settle for less that equal here.

perhaps we should remind RonF that in much of Western Europe, LGBT people can have legal recognition of their marriages or partnerships, serve in the military, and otherwise fully participate in the life of their nation. Why shouldn't we aspire to that>

Patricia Brush said...

Not just in Western Europe. Same-sex marriage is the law in Canada. You can be prosecuted for discriminating against GLBTQ folk. The military and the police march in our Pride Parades.

The only place that I cannot fully participate in Canada is in my church, the place that means the most to me. It was a very deep spiritual wounding that I was not able to be married within my church community, even though the community wanted it to be so.

And no, this doesn't compare to being executed, but it doesn't make it right either.

MarkBrunson said...

Soooo . . .

The Third World is great for theology but lousy for everything else? The theology is part-and-parcel of the terrible conditions.

RonF said...

I have heard a great many sermons, and have read a number of times here and on other websites that when we examine the conditions of our lives we should compare them to others in other parts of the world and understand that while we may think we are poor or that we suffer we are rich and well off compared to the vast majority of the Earth's population. We are called upon to give thanks for this. We are called upon to remember that we should focus on helping those people, to understand that our problems are as nothing compared to theirs, and to make sacrifices in our lives to make other's lives rather than concentrating on our own problems.

I figured that should extend to these issues as well.

"can't serve our country openly in the military"

There is no right to serve in the military. There is no institution in the US that is more centered on the collective group welfare and less centered on the individual's rights and privileges than the U.S. military. Given that it's members are called upon to die for each other if need be that's the only way that a military can function. So if being gay disqualifies you from being in the military, that's frankly just too bad - it's not about you.

And yes, I've read the report that says that 70% of the military members polled say that they have no problem with inclusion of open gays in the military. I've also seen a breakdown of the poll - not publicized in the MSM - that says that the vast majority of that 70% are in non-combat roles. The numbers for the cohort of military members that are in actual combat are just about reversed, which bodes ill for what reversing DADT will do for the effectiveness of the military. Again, this is not a 'rights' issue; membership in the military is a privilege, not a right, and what effect a policy change will have on it's mission should be the only criterion for making a policy change.

Also - are you familiar with the origin of the term "decimate"? We think of it now as meaning something along the lines of "complete destruction". It was originally a military term. It meant that if you killed 1 out of 10 people in a military unit you destroyed it's effectiveness. Consider what that means to a combat unit where 6 or 7 out of every 10 soldiers, sailors or Marines object to the presence of out homosexuals.

"and can be fired in 36 states for being gay"

I must say I was unaware of this. I would not have thought that this was true. It should not be true, except in cases of religious organizations, etc. Can you enlighten me?

" ... not to mention are at risk for hate crimes and our youth for bullying"

So are a lot of other people. For the sin of wearing glasses and being a smart kid I was bullied - threatened, beat up and on one memorable occasion shoved into the john in 7th grade by two boys, knocked to the floor, urinated upon and forced to go to class. Bullying is a awful thing and it should be rooted out and punished. But I grant no special privilege to gay kids on the matter.

RonF said...

I have heard a great many sermons, and have read a number of times here and on other church websites, that when we examine the conditions of our lives we should compare them to others in other parts of the world and understand that while we may think we are poor or that we suffer we are rich and well off compared to the vast majority of the Earth's population. We are called upon to give thanks for this. We are called upon to remember that we should focus on helping those people rather than worrying about ourselves. How often have I been castigated and told that our position as Americans makes us privileged, and that we should stop complaining about our problems because our problems are as nothing compared to theirs.

I figured that should extend to these issues as well.

"can't serve our country openly in the military"

There is no right to serve in the military. There is no institution in the U.S. that is more centered on the collective group's welfare and less centered on the individual than the U.S. military. Given that it's members are expected to unhesitatingly die for each other that's the only way that a military can function. So if being gay disqualifies you from being in the military, that's frankly just too bad - it's not about you. It's about ensuring that the U.S. military is ready and able to carry out its mission.

And yes, I've read the report that says that 70% of the military members polled say that they have no problem with inclusion of open gays in the military. I've also seen a breakdown of the poll - not publicized in the MSM - that says that the vast majority of that 70% are in non-combat roles. The numbers for the cohort of military members that are in actual combat are just about reversed, which bodes ill for what reversing DADT will do for the effectiveness of the military. Again, this is not a 'rights' issue; membership in the military is a privilege, not a right, and what effect a policy change will have on it's mission should be the only criterion for making a policy change.

It's not a moral issue from my viewpoint. If inclusion of out gays in military can be done without decreasing the combat readiness and effectiveness of the military then that's fine by me. I don't care. In such a case gays should be extended the privilege of membership in the military.
But this process seems to me to be more concerned with 'gay rights' (which I put into quotes because there is no right to join the military) and with bowing to a political constituency than it is concerned with the military's effectiveness. I think it's badly focused and that the reports are being written to cover a pre-defined conclusion.

"and can be fired in 36 states for being gay"

I must say I was unaware of this. I had not thought that this was true. It should not be true, absent organizations such as churches, etc. Can you enlighten me?

" ... not to mention are at risk for hate crimes and our youth for bullying"

So are a lot of other people. For the sin of wearing glasses and being a smart kid I was bullied - threatened, beat up and on one memorable occasion shoved into the john in 7th grade by two boys, knocked to the floor, urinated upon and forced to go to class. Bullying is a awful thing and it should be rooted out and punished. But I grant no special privilege to gay kids on the matter.

RonF said...

"can't serve our country openly in the military"

There is no right to serve in the military. There is no institution in the U.S. that is more centered on the collective group's welfare and less centered on the individual than the U.S. military. Given that it's members are expected to unhesitatingly die for each other that's the only way that a military can function. So if being gay disqualifies you from being in the military, that's frankly just too bad - it's not about you. It's about ensuring that the U.S. military is ready and able to carry out its mission.

And yes, I've read the report that says that 70% of the military members polled say that they have no problem with inclusion of open gays in the military. I've also seen a breakdown of the poll - not publicized in the MSM - that says that the vast majority of that 70% are in non-combat roles. The numbers for the cohort of military members that are in actual combat are just about reversed, which bodes ill for what reversing DADT will do for the effectiveness of the military. Again, this is not a 'rights' issue; membership in the military is a privilege, not a right, and what effect a policy change will have on it's mission should be the only criterion for making a policy change.

It's not a moral issue from my viewpoint. If inclusion of out gays in military can be done without decreasing the combat readiness and effectiveness of the military then that's fine by me. I don't care. In such a case gays should be extended the privilege of membership in the military.
But this process seems to me to be more concerned with 'gay rights' (which I put into quotes because there is no right to join the military) and with bowing to a political constituency than it is concerned with the military's effectiveness. I think it's badly focused and that the reports are being written to cover a pre-defined conclusion.

"and can be fired in 36 states for being gay"

I must say I was unaware of this. I had not thought that this was true. It should not be true, absent organizations such as churches, etc. Can you enlighten me?

" ... not to mention are at risk for hate crimes and our youth for bullying"

So are a lot of other people. For the sin of wearing glasses and being a smart kid I was bullied - threatened, beat up and on one memorable occasion shoved into the john in 7th grade by two boys, knocked to the floor, urinated upon and forced to go to class. Bullying is a awful thing and it should be rooted out and punished. But I grant no special privilege to gay kids on the matter.

RonF said...

"and can be fired in 36 states for being gay"

I must say I was unaware of this. I had not thought that this was true. It should not be true, absent organizations such as churches, etc. Can you enlighten me?

" ... not to mention are at risk for hate crimes and our youth for bullying"

So are a lot of other people. For the sin of wearing glasses and being a smart kid I was bullied - threatened, beat up and on one memorable occasion shoved into the john in 7th grade by two boys, knocked to the floor, urinated upon and forced to go to class. Bullying is a awful thing and it should be rooted out and punished. But I grant no special privilege to gay kids on the matter.

RonF said...

The Third World is great for theology but lousy for everything else? The theology is part-and-parcel of the terrible conditions.

I'm not clear on the meaning of your comment. Are you under the impression that my beliefs are informed or influenced by people in Third World nations?

RonF said...

IT said:

"perhaps we should remind RonF that in much of Western Europe, LGBT people can ... serve in the military,"

And in much of Western Europe their militaries cannot fight. In conflict after conflict, whether in the Middle East or in Central Europe (e.g., Kosovo) the U.S. military has done most of the actual fighting while countries such as Germany have required their troops to be put in support roles only.

The fact that out homosexuals can serve in Europe's militaries cannot be shown to be a contributor to this. But overall, adoption of a given policy with regards to how to run a military by European countries is an argument against, not for, adopting the same policy ourselves.

IT said...

1. History lesson: One month before President Truman’s Executive Order, a Gallup poll showed that 63% of American adults endorsed the separation of Blacks and Whites in the military; only 26% supported integration. A 1949 survey of white Army personnel revealed that 32% completely opposed racial integration in any form, and 61% opposed integration if it meant that Whites and Blacks would share sleeping quarters and mess halls. However, 68% of white soldiers were willing to have Blacks and Whites work together, provided they didn’t share barracks or mess facilities.

2. gays are serving in the military, about 60,000 estimated. They just aren't serving OPENLY. So this isn't about letting GLBT people serve, just letting them be honest about who they are.

3. As for being fired for being gay: sexual orientation and gender identity in most states are not protected, which means it is perfectly legal to fire someone because they are gay, in a way that wouldn't be because they are black, or Roman Catholic.

That's why one of the interests in the GLBT community is the federal Employment Non-Discrimination Act, which is also dead in Congress.